Indian Writings in English – II
Assignment 1
The Day India Burned - Partition (A BBC Documentary)
Film Text Analysis
Page 1
The Partition of the Indian subcontinent into India and Pakistan can be said to be one of
the darkest moments in the history of humankind. The joy of gaining independence from the
colonial masters, the British, was heavily overpowered by the heart wrenching brutality of the
Partition. Pain, suffering, separation, uprooting of people, mass exodus, refugee camps,
murders, rapes, violence, hunger...the horrors of the Partition took up innumerable forms. These
wounds continue to bleed till today, as the traumas are ingrained in the minds of the families of
people who were affected by the Partition.
The Partition of the subcontinent into India and Pakistan garnered attention worldwide. The
division of a diverse and culturally rich country like India on the basis of religion was indeed
something unthinkable. The British were peculiarly interested in it. Though they were the one
to have sown the seeds of the Partition, they artfully separated themselves from it and shrugged
of any blame or responsibility coming their way. Even 60 years down the line, the attitude of
the British remains unchanged, as is evident from the BBC documentary, Partition: The Day
India Burned.
This BBC documentary was made for the 60th anniversary of that event in 2007. It gives an
overview of the political events that led up to that disaster. Blended into the film are eye-
witness accounts of people who had lived through the Partition, historical footage of political
leaders and dramatized reconstructions of some of the events. The title of the documentary is
something of a misnomer, as India didn’t burn for a day – the period of time involved was
around a year, as the various communities tried to shift from their ancestral homes to areas with
similar communities; and the burning of homes and villages was only a small part of the
violence.
The documentary is introduced as being “about the effects of Britain's withdrawal from
India in 1947 which triggered one of the biggest migrations in history”. These words seem to
imply that the Indians were unable to take care of their country on their own, after the departure
Page 2
of the British. It’s trying to suggest that the inability of Indian to govern their country was the
reason of Partition, while in reality, the seeds of Partition were sown by the British themselves.
They systematically created hatred between the Hindus and Muslims during their rule, under
their Divide and Rule Policy. This was done in order to prevent them from uniting against the
British.
The documentary pits the three major religions of India (Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs)
against each other and shoves the blame of the Partition entirely onto the shoulders of Indian
politicians and the general public. It kind of opines that the communal harmony among Indians
was superficial and the cause of the violence was the deep-rooted hatred and religious divide
among Indians. The role of the British in creating the communal unrest is nowhere discussed.
Also, the hand of Lord Mountbatten in this disaster is wiped clean, while in reality, his hands
were the one which drew the Partition lines and sparked off the unrest among people.
“India was once the jewel in the British Empire's crown. But when it came to pulling out of
the country in August 1947, things turned into shambles.” - This introductory sentence kind of
sums up the colonisers’ perspective about the Partition. India is referred to as having being “the
jewel in the empire’s crown for nearly 200 years”. This is a clear reflection of colonial
mentality. Its not a matter of pride for India to be referred to as the jewel of the British Crown.
To address it as such, even in today’s days, is an act of arrogance. Also, the British didn’t care
for India like a jewel. The very reason for things turning into shambles in India was the 200-
years long of plundering by the British.
The documentary needs to be applauded for one reason though: that is, it brings across the
human tragedy of Partition so very well. It emphasises on eye-witness accounts of the suffering,
the bravery, the hatred and the helplessness felt during those days by people who were directly
involved in the events. The film does a good job in narrating the harrowing reality and
unimaginable violence and murder inflicted upon the 15 million trying to flee to their new
country. Mass violence resulted in long-time friends and neighbours killing each other because
they were the 'wrong' religion. Entire trains of people were slaughtered, schoolgirls raped and
women had their breasts cut off. 15 million were displaced from their own land and more than a
million lost their lives.
The story is mostly told through the testimony of people who lived through the time of
Partition. These people talk about how they had lived together with people of other faiths for
centuries, but were forced out of their homes as one of the most ethnically diverse nations in the
Page 3
world was spliced into two. The film gathers an impressive number of contemporary
eyewitnesses to tell their sides of the tale, including Nehru’s niece, Mountbatten’s daughter,
and Gandhi disciple Ashoka Gupta. Dramatized reconstructions are used to evoke some of the
mistrust, violence and upheaval that ensued. Also, historical video footage and photographs are
effectively made use of at appropriate places.
The 90- minutes long documentary talks about the following important events which led to
the Partition:
• British motivation for leaving India after World War 2 in a quick manner;
• the underlying distrust of Hindus and Muslims of each other despite centuries of living
together;
• Muslim educational and economic backwardness relative to Hindus and their fear of
Hindu domination in a united India;
• the failure of the March 1946 Cabinet Mission in Shimla on account of Nehru's refusal
to a agree to a decentralized Subcontinent,
• the beginning of the Hindu-Muslim communal riots with Jinnah's call for Direct Action
in Calcutta in August 1946;
• the desperate attempts made by Gandhi to effect Hindu-Muslim unity via appeal to their
humanity;
• and the pressure exerted on most Princely States to agree to ascension to India.
The documentary strikingly describes the manipulation of people by political leaders in the
name of religion. It depicts the slaughter, looting, raping, and mayhem among different
communities at the village level; the deep reluctance of people to abandon their generational
homes; the brave attempts of certain individuals to save their neighbours of other communities
from forcible ethnic and religious cleansing; the horrific price paid by women for defending
their honour; the utter lack of governmental preparation for a mass migration of people; the
needless human massacre caused by Mountbatten's decision to speed up the pre-planned
Page 4
Partition; and the decline of previously culturally rich and cosmopolitan cities like Lahore due
to bloodshed and loss of communal diversity.
Another admirable point of the film is that it makes one thing clear: no one religion was
guilty or nor was any one religion blameless. All the three major religions of India (Hindus,
Muslims and Sikhs) were at each other’s throat during the Partition. The Partition took part on
religious lines. Muslims were said to belong to Pakistan, while Hindus and Sikhs were to live in
India. Both of these sides were equally guilty for the violence unleashed during the Partition.
Both sides suffered severe casualties. Both sides were equally guilt and had equal share in
blame. It was not a case of an assailant group and a victim group. Both groups had both equal
proportions of both kinds of people. Victims were on both sides, so were assailants. This clears
the misconception of lying the entire of the violence on any one religion.
Leaving behind the escapist and arrogant supremacist standpoint, the film is a pretty good
piece of work. Gathering together a number of survivors and eye-witnesses is no joke. Also, it
can be said that the film doesn’t reduce the gravity and intensity of the Partition one bit. It is
quite detailed and strikes the imagination of the viewers. It can be said that the film presents a
clear picture of the brutality which occurred due to the Partition.
The Partition of India was of the greatest humanitarian tragedies in modern times. People
were unsuspectingly divided along communal and religious lines, and turned against each other
in a fury of violence. The tensions sparked off at that time dominate the region even today.
Every now and then, it explodes and it had led to one of the longest separatist wars in modern
history (Kashmir). All of this stem from the fateful decisions that were made at this time. This
documentary is highly recommended for anyone who wishes to understand why such things
happen, as it presents a part of the background story in a hauntingly effective manner.